Titius-Bode Law
Solar System Order
The
Titius-Bode Law has been debated for over a century and mainstream science has
labelled the concept as a total sham and nobody doing research on it can get
published in the mainstream scientific journals. It is hoped that what follows
will convince the typical reader that this dream state is just one example of
how scientific specialist are leading earth mankind into a complete abyss.
The graph
below is from Wikipedia and used here as incidental usage.
Because of
the particular scale, the T-B Law data follows very close to actual distances
for eight different planets including Ceres in the asteroid belt. What kind of
foolish science would throw out the entire concept which appears to go off
target in the last three points? Just
because there didn’t seem to be an easy explanation for solar system order and
perhaps to foul up the religious folks who wanted the solar system to have been
created, this important consideration was blackballed.
In the
diagram below, also from Wikipedia, the answer is almost obvious. The outer planets like Pluto and Neptune are
very near the Kuiper Belt and are obviously impacted by all that other
material. And there is the re-emerging theory of a large distant planet or
perhaps a brown dwarf star which may be having some impact.
But there is
a funny twist of fate which is now going to plaque mainstream science. The
chart below essentially re-created from Wikipedia shows that if one averages
Neptune, Pluto and the three other minor planets Orcus3, Haumea3 and Quaoar3,
the T-B rule agrees with actual distances with the ratio of 39.1 AU compared to
38.8 AU at 0.7 percent. Of course that is likely just an accident since there
are thousands of other pieces to the puzzle of the Kuiper Belt as shown above.
|
k
|
T–B rule distance (AU)
|
Planet
|
Semimajor axis (AU)
|
Deviation from prediction1
|
|
0
|
0.4
|
0.39
|
−3.23%
|
|
|
1
|
0.7
|
0.72
|
3.33%
|
|
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0.00%
|
|
|
4
|
1.6
|
1.52
|
−4.77%
|
|
|
8
|
2.8
|
2.77
|
−1.16%
|
|
|
16
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
0.05%
|
|
|
32
|
10
|
9.55
|
−4.45%
|
|
|
64
|
19.6
|
19.22
|
−1.95%
|
|
|
128
|
38.8
|
30.11
|
−22.40%
|
|
|
39.17
|
0.96%
|
|||
|
39.54
|
1.02%
|
|||
|
43.22
|
11.39%
|
|||
|
43.4
|
11.87%
|
Clearly
magnetic fields have the exact capability to organize solar systems in the
manner in which they are proven to be. The sun has a huge magnetic field and is
capable of inducing magnetic fields if the planet does not have one of its own.
Of course, it has been known that gravity also has the capability to organize
moons around some of the large planets. It is likely that there is more than one
organizing force in solar systems and even galaxies.
Jim Branson
Retired Professional Engineering Manage
bransonjim9 at gmail dot com
